Skip to content

Compliance Justification Document (FTC v. Drizly 2022)

Justify how controls meet the FTC consent order and map to a framework (e.g., NIST CSF) for examiner or auditor review.


Purpose

This mapping document shows how implemented controls satisfy obligations and expectations implicated by FTC v. Drizly 2022. It is structured for audit and legal review, so each requirement is tied to implementation rationale, ownership, and verifiable artifacts rather than policy statements alone.

Control-to-order mapping (summary)

Order requirement Control / evidence Framework (optional)
Written program Program document; governance charter PR.IP
Designated coordinator Role designation; reporting structure Governance
Risk assessment Risk register; assessment reports ID.RA
Access control / MFA MFA enforcement; access reviews; offboarding PR.AC
No credentials in code Repo scanning; change review PR.IP, secure SDLC
Monitoring Logging; detection rules; assessment DE.CM
Data minimization Retention schedule; deletion logs PR.IP, privacy
Biennial assessment Third-party report; remediation tracking Governance

Document-type guide: Compliance Justification Document

Writing tips: Writing best practices — Compliance Justification Document

© 2026 Yi Zhang. Licensed under the MIT License.
Last updated: 2026 April 17 9:37 AM